{"id":3878,"date":"2003-08-13T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-08-13T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.westpark-gamers.de\/blog\/2003\/08\/13\/session-report-review-13-08-2003\/"},"modified":"2003-08-13T12:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-08-13T10:00:00","slug":"session-report-review-13-08-2003","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.westpark-gamers.de\/blog\/2003\/08\/13\/session-report-review-13-08-2003\/","title":{"rendered":"Session Report & Review 13.08.2003"},"content":{"rendered":"

Session Report & Review 13.08.2003<\/h2>\n

Author<\/b>: Moritz<\/p>\n

at the table<\/b>: Andrea, Aaron, Hans, G\u00fcnther, Peter, Moritz<\/p>\n

on the table<\/b>: Tutanchamun, Restaurant, Medici, Bluff<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. <\/a>Restaurant<\/a><\/b>\"Restaurant\n

    This older game from the otherwise pretty reliable and long defunct company Flying Turtle
    \ndid not rock our world – instead it garnered laurels as being one of the worst rated
    \ngames in our group ever! The theme and cards remind one immediately of a more long-lived
    \ngame: “    Caf\u00e9 International<\/a>“, but whereas in “Caf\u00e9 International” the
    \ngoal of the game is placing the guests for victory points, “Restaurant” deals
    \nwith fulfilling orders to become the most successful waiter.<\/p>\n

    The game consists of two phases: In the first phase players collect orders from the
    \nvarious tables by “exploring” the orthogonally adjacent table next to the last
    \nexplored table and leaving a pawn of their own colour on the empty space. You’ll find
    \nvarious menus ranging from 100-600 points worth, “Jump cards” (enable you to
    \nchoose any table as your next table), “Go twice” cards, which enable you to,
    \nwell, go twice, and “Fast food” cards, which let you steal menus from other
    \nplayers (drawn blindly). There are also “reserved” cards, which let you place
    \nthe orders you collected until then in a “safe” stack that cannot be robbed.<\/p>\n

    The phase continues until either all tables have been explored, or the players have
    \nmanoeuvred themselves in a dead end (which you can’t until at least 30 tables have
    \nbeen uncovered). Now points are counted and the lowest scoring player begins the second
    \nround. Now you have to place<\/b> the cards on the tables, i.e. “serving”
    \nthem. Only cards you place on your “own” spaces (with a pawn) will give you
    \npoints, therefore it is important to have your pawns well spread in the first phase. The
    \nother cards can be used like before, with the difference of the “fast food”
    \ncards, which can now be used as worthless cards to be placed on other players tables (if
    \nyou can’t reach your own ones). For some strange reason the “cover at least
    \n30” rule does not apply here, therefore the game can end very quickly by a player
    \nmoving into a dead end (and the leading player will always do that). Now the cards are
    \ncounted again, but this time the cards in your hand count negative (and the
    \n“reserved” cards double<\/b> negative). The scores of the two phases are
    \nadded and determine the winner.<\/p>\n

    \"Restaurant Many problems become apparent in the description
    \n already. The worst aspect of the game is the fact that the luck of the card draw is
    \n actually heightened by being able to use them twice (you keep all your cards and go
    \n through them again). The “Jump” and “Go Twice” cards are the
    \n worst offenders. “Jump”, for example, not only gives you the ability to
    \n spread your pawns to other areas of the board, no, you can use it again<\/u> to
    \n safely place your cards on your tables in the next phase (which otherwise is very
    \n difficult to achieve). This makes the drawer double lucky (and the other players
    \n look on sheepishly). In our game I only drew menu cards and two reservation cards.
    \n Most of the cards were stolen by other players with their “fast food”
    \n cards, until I could use the reservation cards to protect the other cards. The
    \n second phase started with Peter and then Guenther played a jump card to place an
    \n order in a dead end, thereby ending the game without giving anybody the chance to do
    \n anything. As he had earned the most points in the round before, he therefore also
    \n became the winner. My reservation cards now pushed my negative points to the max,
    \n and I didn’t even get to have a turn!<\/p>\n

    From the perspective of Guenther this was the best play, but of course a mechanism which
    \nallows this makes for a very unsatisfying game, in which you certainly feel
    \n“played” rather than being a player.<\/p>\n

    For a German game this one has a very high luck factor, and there is practically no
    \ndecision making, so it is easy to say that this is simply not a good game (and the
    \nartwork is bad and uninspired, too). The only thing going for it is its short length, but
    \nyou can play more interesting games that have the same trait. Avoid, if you can\u2026<\/p>\n

    Moritz Eggert<\/i><\/div>\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n
    view\/add comments\"\"\/