by Moritz Eggert<\/p>\n
Hello my friends – I hope you had a happy holiday and a good New Year! 2008 seems to have been a
\ngood year for wargames. If one looks at the current top five at boardgamegeek the first FOUR games
\nhave all been published in 2008 and the fifth game in 2007. These games are “Combat Commander:
\nPacific”, “Conflict of Heroes”, “Devil’s Cauldron”, “Unhappy King
\nCharles” and “Napoleon’s Triumph”. “Conflict of Heroes” has gotten the
\nmost positive buzz lately – I could see with my own eyes that it was one of the most played games
\nat Boardgamegeek con. Unfortunately I have yet to play this game, so I reserve final judgment over
\nit, but the voices that express a great liking to this system are all very believable ones.<\/p>\n
But this time I want to talk about another game that was my personal favourite wargame of 2008,
\nand that is “Pursuit of Glory”, “Paths of Glory Part II” if you will. I have to
\nfully admit that I am a sucker for the Near East as a theatre of war – I find the mixture of
\ncultures and religions highly fascinating, and the history of the region is full of heroic and
\nsometimes less-heroic strife that makes for a fascinating backdrop.<\/p>\n
Everybody who has ever played me as the Germans in any World War II game knows that I always
\nwill try to force the scenic route through Turkey. My favourite strategy in Barbarossa to Berlin is
\nfor example to conquer Alexandria and Cairo from the East; after coming through all of Turkey and
\nthen Palestine, and then put pressure on the Russians from the South. Of course this is a strategy
\nthat is often bound to fail, but if it works it’s great fun!<\/p>\n
But I also have to admit that playing the Central Powers in a World War I game like PoG is a
\nless guilty pleasure than playing the Nazi forces in WW II, it just feels better if you know what I
\nmean. There was more honour in World War I, even though it was a senseless and extremely cruel
\nwar.<\/p>\n
Every “Paths of Glory” player knows that it is dangerous to underestimate the Near
\nEast, but there never seem to be enough resources to really be active in a big way. On the PoG map
\nthe Near East is a tiny sub-map with only a handful of spaces. This now changes as now this theatre
\ngets star coverage in “Pursuit of Glory” and is blown up to epic proportions. This also
\nenabled the designers, Brad Stock and Brian Stock, to really go into great detail regarding the
\nincredibly varied forces that were fighting in this region. These might range from Russian tank
\ncompanies to hardy Turkish infanterists, from wild and untamed tribes attacking on horseback with
\nmakeshift weapons to religiously motivated rebellions. And there is always the Berlin-Baghdad
\nrailway to save the day!<\/p>\n
“Pursuit of Glory” comes in pretty much the same format as the original Paths of
\nGlory, and each PoG player will recognize many features from the old game. It is a card-driven game
\nthat uses the basic 20th century warfare system created by Ted Raicer that is also used in
\nBarbarossa to Berlin and Shifting Sands, albeit with some differences. Unlike for example
\nNapoleonic Wars, in which it is impossible to act without leaders, here we deal with large combat
\nunits and small combat units, each of which represents an organized force like a division or a
\ncorps or even a wild tribe. This means that organizing a unified front is all important – holes in
\nyour front can always be exploited and attrition can wipe out whole stacks of units if the enemy
\ndrives through your lines and cuts your supply. This makes for nail biting decisions and great
\nsuspense, as any PoG player can attest to.<\/p>\n
The game also uses three decks that consecutively come into play – one for
\n“Mobilization”, one for “Limited War” and one for “Total War”. Each
\ncard doubles as an event or ops, and most of the time you can only use one of each. The events lock
\ninto each other in complicated ways – some will usually have to be played if you want to be
\nsuccessful or are a prerequisite for other events, others are more optional. Timing is of the
\nessence!<\/p>\n
The map depicts part of the Balkans including Romania and Bulgaria as well as Serbia, Greece,
\nall of Turkey, and great parts of Persia and North Africa as well as the Caucasian region. The map
\nis huge and incredibly detailed. One thing that immediately is noticeable is that there are a LOT
\nof victory point spaces, I would estimate at least double as much as in PoG. This means that
\nbasically each part of the map will really be used all the time, every front is equally important.
\nThere are also arrows leading to regions like India, which aren’t fully depicted. Any historian
\nknows that the Near East front was extremely fluid, and sometimes it was even unclear why people
\nfought against each other. The Germans for example often tried to incite religious anger against
\nthe colonial powers and had Muslim allies, like the Turkish but also tribes from Afghanistan and
\nNorth Africa. The British on the other hand gained the tribal allies that were oppressed by the
\nTurkish expansionist interests, most famously of course Lawrence of Arabia with his Arab Northern
\nArmy. So it was Muslims against Christians, Christians against Christians, and Muslims against
\nMuslims, not to forget the Russian-Orthodox forces turned atheist through the Russian revolution-
\nsurely a crazy time. Throw in some colonial forces from India, French foreign armies and many
\nfascinating historic events and cook to perfection – voila, “Pursuit of Glory”
\nindeed!<\/p>\n
Now I have one big caveat – this is not an easy game to learn. I would actually not recommend
\nplaying this game before having played “PoG” a couple of times. It comes with a rulebook
\nthat makes “Here I Stand” and “Empire of the Sun” look like quick reading
\nmaterial, it’s a long tome and also comes with the usual historical commentary and detailed
\nexamples of play that we are used to with GMT. But the good news is that all these rules are
\nextremely well organized and everything is easy to find. I would say that these are some of the
\nbest rules that GMT have ever produced, and I personally found no area of play opaque or difficult
\nto get, even though one is bound to overlook some chrome during first playthroughs. Most
\nimportantly the game includes 2 primers, one for people who have NOT played “PoG” yet
\n(and I don’t envy them starting with this game -the original PoG, which is not an easy game as
\nwell, will seem like Snakes and Ladders to them afterwards), and a primer for people who HAVE
\nplayed PoG already. The latter primer is only 2 pages long and lists all the rules sections which
\ninclude differences from what you are used to from PoG.<\/p>\n
What I did is read only these sections (which didn’t take that long) and then immediately
\nstarted the game in a solitaire runthrough to get used to the details. Everything is well explained
\nand it was easy to find the passages which included new concepts from then onwards, I never found
\nthat I had to read everything; I just looked up the new details.<\/p>\n
One player plays the Central Powers, which is mostly Turks but also some German, Austrian and
\nBulgarian troops, as well as the aforementioned many tribes.<\/p>\n
The Allies on the other hand control everybody else, British, French, Romanians and many more,
\neven one single Italian counter makes it into play after a certain event is played.<\/p>\n
Now to the new concepts that make play very different from PoG.<\/p>\n
First of all there are the irregular troops and the Jihad Level. Some of these irregular troops
\nare the aforementioned tribes, but there are also very unique troops like a camel corps that have
\nspecial rules. Tribes are weak units and basically live of the land, which means they don’t
\nneed normal supply sources like the normal troops. This also means that they can rummage around
\nbehind enemy lines, disturbing their supply, taking VP spaces and much more. The Central Powers use
\nthe tribes a bit more because they try to control the “Jihad Level”, which is influenced
\nby card play and also the capture of religiously important spaces by the Allies. The higher the
\nJihad level the more tribes can be placed, and believe me, they can really be a nuisance. PoG had 3
\ncorps that represented tribes, this game has literally dozens of them, and they constantly pop up
\nbehind your lines.<\/p>\n
Another new aspect is headquarters. The Near East was a theatre in which personal abilities and
\nbravado of the commanders mattered more than in the more static European fronts, this is why one
\nhas headquarter counters here, each with it’s own special abilities. Think of them as leader
\ncounters, they also don’t add to the stacking limit as well.<\/p>\n
Another new concept is Railroads, which are used in supplying but also transporting troops
\naround the map. And there are also Assets, an interesting concept that enables players to actually
\nbuild a Large combat unit by combining 2 or 3 small combat units, a tactic that is especially
\nimportant for the Turkish\/Central player who starts out with weak defence that has to be brought up
\na step quickly. There are also regions that depict the greater areas that can’t be depicted
\nfully on the map, like India or Afghanistan, and there is also, like in PoG, an insert map, this
\ntime of Gallipoli, a Turkish area that saw some of the hardest and violent fighting in WW I.<\/p>\n
So how does it play? First of all both players will be basically overwhelmed by the choices they
\nhave. Even the first action of the game is not as clear cut as in PoG, with Guns of August being
\nmostly the standard play. The Central Powers basically are on the defence from the start on, and
\nthey have not one but 5 fronts. The most active front at the start of the game is the Northern
\nCaucasian Front where Russian armies attack, but these will hopefully fade away through the Russian
\nrevolution after a while, which is triggered through several card play steps, like in PoG. There is
\nalso the Eastern front, as Persia – although neutral at first- can quickly be brought onto the
\nAllied side. Then there is the Southeast and the Persian Gulf where the Allies can bring in some
\neasy invasions. Then there is the Southwest, with British forces lingering before an expanse of
\ndesert. And not to forget the Northwest, with looming involvement of the resurrected Serbia and
\nalso Greece and Romania. Basically it’s trouble everywhere, and the Allied player can even open
\nup new problem zones by bringing in seaborne invasions.<\/p>\n
Interestingly enough the Central Forces bear quite a punch, perhaps more so than in the original
\nPoG, through the involvement of the tribes. Even though the Allies theoretically feel powerful they
\nare much less so in reality because it is very difficult to really put pressure on one point.
\nBecause the front is so fluid even a carefully planned invasion can suddenly turn into only a minor
\nnuisance, and it is really difficult for the Allies to create one big push like they usually do in
\nold-style PoG. But the Central Player has one big problem, and that is dwindling resources. Even
\nthough Turkish armies start out quite powerful they become less and less so because of their
\nReplacement point limitation, at some point they just wither away. And even though the Allied
\nplayer doesn’t have a hammer that breaks through lines, he can create many, many pressure
\npoints, like small pricking needles, at some point these will have their effect, that’s for
\nsure, it’s only a matter of time.<\/p>\n
So far I found Pursuit of Glory to be a balanced and exciting game. The action is consistent –
\nthere will never be a long lull with both players playing replacement actions, everything is always
\non the move. In my opinion it is the best game on this theatre of WW I so far – it packs in loads
\nof historical detail in a manageable way. Even though this is certainly on the higher end of
\ncard-driven games complexity I can only highly recommend it to anybody who likes this genre and
\nthis period, the game’s approach is extremely solid and everything seems to have been well
\nresearched and implemented. So put on your turban or your helmet and lead your armies to glory or
\nthe vain pursuit of the same and play this game – you won’t rue the day you bought it!<\/p>\n
Happy gaming in 2009, Moritz over and out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Pursuit of Glory by Moritz Eggert Hello my friends – I hope you had a happy holiday and a good New Year! 2008 seems to have been a good year for wargames. If one looks at the current top five at boardgamegeek the first FOUR games have all been published in 2008 and the fifth … Pursuit of Glory<\/span> weiterlesen